NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs NVIDIA GeForce4 448 Go
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 and NVIDIA GeForce4 448 Go videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 6.2x more core clock speed: 1242 MHz vs 200 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 150 nm
- 28x more maximum memory size: 1792 MB vs 64 MB
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 999 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 200.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1201 vs 6
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 January 2009 vs 1 March 2002 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz vs 200 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 150 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 1792 MB vs 64 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1201 vs 6 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce4 448 Go
- 8.7x more texture fill rate: 800 MTexel / s vs 92.2 billion / sec
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 199 vs 96
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 800 MTexel / s vs 92.2 billion / sec |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 199 vs 96 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce4 448 Go
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 | NVIDIA GeForce4 448 Go |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1201 | 6 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 96 | 199 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 21048 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3443 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3443 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3107 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3107 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 | NVIDIA GeForce4 448 Go | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Celsius |
| Code name | GT200B | NV18 A4 |
| Launch date | 8 January 2009 | 1 March 2002 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $500 | |
| Place in performance rating | 920 | 923 |
| Price now | $159.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 8.53 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 200 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 150 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Pipelines | 2x 240 | |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion / sec | 800 MTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 289 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 29 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, Two Dual Link DVIHDMI | No outputs |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| SLI options | Quad | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 8.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 1.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 64 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| SLI | ||
