NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 83% higher core clock speed: 1242 MHz vs 680 MHz
- 16.9x more texture fill rate: 92.2 billion / sec vs 5.44 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 2x 240 vs 120
- 7.3x better floating-point performance: 2x 596.2 gflops vs 163.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- 7x more maximum memory size: 1792 MB vs 256 MB
- 6.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1201 vs 192
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3107 vs 1503
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3107 vs 1503
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 January 2009 vs 14 May 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz vs 680 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion / sec vs 5.44 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2x 240 vs 120 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops vs 163.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 1792 MB vs 256 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1201 vs 192 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3107 vs 1503 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3107 vs 1503 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 999 MHz
- 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 329 vs 96
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 999 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 329 vs 96 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1201 | 192 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 96 | 329 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 21048 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3443 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3443 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3107 | 1503 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3107 | 1503 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | TeraScale |
| Code name | GT200B | M76 |
| Launch date | 8 January 2009 | 14 May 2007 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $500 | |
| Place in performance rating | 920 | 921 |
| Price now | $159.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 8.53 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 680 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 163.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Pipelines | 2x 240 | 120 |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion / sec | 5.44 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 289 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 390 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, Two Dual Link DVIHDMI | No outputs |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-II |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| SLI options | Quad | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB / s | 24 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR2, GDDR3 |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| SLI | ||
| PowerPlay 7.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 295 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 448 Go
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 295 vs
ATIRadeon Xpress 1250
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 295 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 295 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 295 vs
ATIRadeon HD 5550
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 295 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460
