NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 vs ATI Radeon Xpress 1250
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 and ATI Radeon Xpress 1250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 120x more pipelines: 2x 240 vs 4
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 80 nm
- 27.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1201 vs 43
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 January 2009 vs 30 August 2006 |
Pipelines | 2x 240 vs 4 |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 80 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1201 vs 43 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon Xpress 1250
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 197 vs 96
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 197 vs 96 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
GPU 2: ATI Radeon Xpress 1250
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 | ATI Radeon Xpress 1250 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1201 | 43 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 96 | 197 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 21048 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3443 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3443 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3107 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3107 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 | ATI Radeon Xpress 1250 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | |
Code name | GT200B | |
Launch date | 8 January 2009 | 30 August 2006 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $500 | |
Place in performance rating | 920 | 922 |
Price now | $159.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.53 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 80 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 2x 240 | 4 |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 289 Watt | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Boost clock speed | 400 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, Two Dual Link DVIHDMI | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | Quad | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | |
OpenGL | 2.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
SLI |