NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 2400
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM and ATI Radeon HD 2400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 63% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 398 MHz
- 22.9x more texture fill rate: 36.4 GTexel / s vs 1.592 GTexel / s
- 8.4x more pipelines: 336 vs 40
- 27.4x better floating-point performance: 873.6 gflops vs 31.84 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- 3.4x more memory clock speed: 3400 MHz vs 990 MHz
- 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 635
- 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 635
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 October 2010 vs 19 February 2008 |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 398 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 36.4 GTexel / s vs 1.592 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 336 vs 40 |
Floating-point performance | 873.6 gflops vs 31.84 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 3400 MHz vs 990 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 635 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 635 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2400
- 7.5x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 150 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2400
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM | ATI Radeon HD 2400 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.202 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 661.765 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.872 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.112 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 76.736 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 635 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 635 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 121 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 298 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM | ATI Radeon HD 2400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale |
Code name | GF104 | RV610 |
Launch date | 11 October 2010 | 19 February 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1061 | 1064 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 398 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 873.6 gflops | 31.84 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 336 | 40 |
Texture fill rate | 36.4 GTexel / s | 1.592 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 180 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 1x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 210 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB / s | 7.92 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3400 MHz | 990 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |