AMD Radeon R9 M275X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M275X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M275X

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 38% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 650 MHz
• Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 37 GTexel / s vs 36.4 GTexel / s
• Around 90% higher pipelines: 640 vs 336
• Around 36% better floating-point performance: 1,184 gflops vs 873.6 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.109 vs 22.202
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.187 vs 1.872
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 33.837 vs 28.112
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 91.407 vs 76.736

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM

• 3x more memory clock speed: 3400 MHz vs 1125 MHz
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 661.765 vs 283.116
• 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3712 vs 1228
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 1705
• 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3712 vs 1228
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 1705

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M275X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	28.109 22.202
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	283.116 661.765
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.187 1.872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33.837 28.112
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	91.407 76.736
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1228 3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1705 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1228 3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1705 3353

Compare specifications (specs)