NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 5770
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM and ATI Radeon HD 5770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 0 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 36.4 GTexel / s vs 34.0 GTexel / s
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.202 vs 9.373
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 661.765 vs 459.025
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.872 vs 0.906
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 28.112 vs 27.022
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 76.736 vs 48.793
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3712 vs 2673
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3712 vs 2673
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 2799
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 2799
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 October 2010 vs 13 October 2009 |
Texture fill rate | 36.4 GTexel / s vs 34.0 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.202 vs 9.373 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 661.765 vs 459.025 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.872 vs 0.906 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.112 vs 27.022 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 76.736 vs 48.793 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 vs 2673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 vs 2673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 2799 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 2799 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5770
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 2.4x more pipelines: 800 vs 336
- Around 56% better floating-point performance: 1,360.0 gflops vs 873.6 gflops
- Around 39% lower typical power consumption: 108 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 41% higher memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 3400 MHz
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Pipelines | 800 vs 336 |
Floating-point performance | 1,360.0 gflops vs 873.6 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 108 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz vs 3400 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5770
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM | ATI Radeon HD 5770 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.202 | 9.373 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 661.765 | 459.025 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.872 | 0.906 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.112 | 27.022 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 76.736 | 48.793 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 2673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 2673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 2799 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 2799 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1343 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 335 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10495 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2636 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2636 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM | ATI Radeon HD 5770 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GF104 | Juniper |
Launch date | 11 October 2010 | 13 October 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1098 | 1099 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $159 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 873.6 gflops | 1,360.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 336 | 800 |
Texture fill rate | 36.4 GTexel / s | 34.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 108 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,040 million |
Boost clock speed | 850 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 210 mm | 208 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB / s | 76.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3400 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity |