AMD FirePro V5900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro V5900 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro V5900
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 52% higher pipelines: 512 vs 336
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5078 vs 3353
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5078 vs 3353
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 24 May 2011 vs 11 October 2010 |
Pipelines | 512 vs 336 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5078 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5078 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 90% higher texture fill rate: 36.4 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s
- Around 42% better floating-point performance: 873.6 gflops vs 614.4 gflops
- Around 70% higher memory clock speed: 3400 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.202 vs 8.167
- Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 661.765 vs 409.102
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.872 vs 0.772
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 28.112 vs 20.064
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 76.736 vs 66.259
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3712 vs 2091
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3712 vs 2091
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 36.4 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 873.6 gflops vs 614.4 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 3400 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.202 vs 8.167 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 661.765 vs 409.102 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.872 vs 0.772 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.112 vs 20.064 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 76.736 vs 66.259 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 vs 2091 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 vs 2091 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro V5900
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro V5900 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1265 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2880 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.167 | 22.202 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 409.102 | 661.765 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.772 | 1.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.064 | 28.112 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 66.259 | 76.736 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2091 | 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5078 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2091 | 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5078 | 3353 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro V5900 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Fermi |
Code name | Cayman | GF104 |
Launch date | 24 May 2011 | 11 October 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1098 | 1099 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 614.4 gflops | 873.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 336 |
Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s | 36.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,640 million | 1,950 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 230 mm | 210 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB / s | 108.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 3400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |