NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM versus ATI Radeon HD 5770
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM and ATI Radeon HD 5770 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 0 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 7% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 36.4 GTexel / s versus 34.0 GTexel / s
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.202 versus 9.373
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 661.765 versus 459.025
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.872 versus 0.906
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 28.112 versus 27.022
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 76.736 versus 48.793
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3712 versus 2673
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3712 versus 2673
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 versus 2799
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 versus 2799
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 11 October 2010 versus 13 October 2009 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 36.4 GTexel / s versus 34.0 GTexel / s |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.202 versus 9.373 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 661.765 versus 459.025 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.872 versus 0.906 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.112 versus 27.022 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 76.736 versus 48.793 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 versus 2673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 versus 2673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 2799 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 2799 |
Raisons pour considerer le ATI Radeon HD 5770
- Environ 31% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 850 MHz versus 650 MHz
- 2.4x plus de pipelines: 800 versus 336
- Environ 56% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,360.0 gflops versus 873.6 gflops
- Environ 39% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 108 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 41% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 4800 MHz versus 3400 MHz
Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz versus 650 MHz |
Pipelines | 800 versus 336 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,360.0 gflops versus 873.6 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 108 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4800 MHz versus 3400 MHz |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5770
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM | ATI Radeon HD 5770 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.202 | 9.373 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 661.765 | 459.025 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.872 | 0.906 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.112 | 27.022 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 76.736 | 48.793 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 2673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 2673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 2799 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 2799 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1343 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 335 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10495 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2636 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2636 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM | ATI Radeon HD 5770 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | GF104 | Juniper |
Date de sortie | 11 October 2010 | 13 October 2009 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1098 | 1099 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Conception | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $159 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 650 MHz | 850 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 873.6 gflops | 1,360.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 336 | 800 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 36.4 GTexel / s | 34.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 108 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,950 million | 1,040 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 850 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 210 mm | 208 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 108.8 GB / s | 76.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3400 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity |