NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 vs ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 and ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 79% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 286 Watt
- Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2272 vs 1309
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3323
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3323
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 July 2010 vs 12 August 2008 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 286 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2272 vs 1309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3323 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3323 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 675 MHz
- 6x more texture fill rate: 2x 28 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 37.8 GTexel / s
- 4.8x more pipelines: 2x 800 vs 336
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 2x 1,120.0 gflops vs 907.2 gflops
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 2x 1 GB vs 768 MB
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 565 vs 388
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 675 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 2x 28 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 37.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 800 vs 336 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,120.0 gflops vs 907.2 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2x 1 GB vs 768 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 565 vs 388 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 | ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2272 | 1309 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 388 | 565 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7860 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.445 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 617.847 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.823 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.222 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.61 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3351 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3323 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3351 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3323 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 | ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale |
Code name | GF104 | R700 |
Launch date | 12 July 2010 | 12 August 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | $550 |
Place in performance rating | 917 | 466 |
Price now | $89.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 34.71 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 675 MHz | 700 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 907.2 gflops | 2x 1,120.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 336 | 2x 800 |
Texture fill rate | 37.8 GTexel / s | 2x 28 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 286 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 956 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376"(111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 8.25"(210 mm) (21 cm) | 267 mm |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 768 MB | 2x 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB / s | 2x 115.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |