NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 and NVIDIA GeForce 210 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- 9.1x more texture fill rate: 37.8 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s
- 21x more pipelines: 336 vs 16
- 23x better floating-point performance: 907.2 gflops vs 39.36 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 768 MB vs 512 MB
- 7.2x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 18x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2272 vs 126
- 12.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 388 vs 30
- 3.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7860 vs 2438
- 7.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 497
- 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 688
- 7.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 497
- 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 688
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 July 2010 vs 12 October 2009 |
| Texture fill rate | 37.8 GTexel / s vs 4.16 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 336 vs 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 907.2 gflops vs 39.36 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 768 MB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2272 vs 126 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 388 vs 30 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7860 vs 2438 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 688 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 210
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1402 MHz vs 675 MHz
- 5.2x lower typical power consumption: 30.5 Watt vs 160 Watt
| Core clock speed | 1402 MHz vs 675 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30.5 Watt vs 160 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 210
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 | NVIDIA GeForce 210 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2272 | 126 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 388 | 30 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7860 | 2438 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.445 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 617.847 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.823 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.222 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.61 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3351 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3351 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 688 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 | NVIDIA GeForce 210 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GF104 | GT218 |
| Launch date | 12 July 2010 | 12 October 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | $29.49 |
| Place in performance rating | 917 | 1674 |
| Price now | $89.99 | $32.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 34.71 | 6.81 |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 675 MHz | 1402 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 907.2 gflops | 39.36 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 336 | 16 |
| Texture fill rate | 37.8 GTexel / s | 4.16 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 30.5 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 260 million |
| CUDA cores | 16 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | Internal |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA, DVIVGADisplayPort |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
| Height | 4.376"(111 mm) (11.1 cm) | 2.731" (6.9 cm) |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 8.25"(210 mm) (21 cm) | 6.60" (16.8 cm) |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 3.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 768 MB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB / s | 8.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR2 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 295
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460 vs
ATIRadeon HD 5550
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460 SE
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8850M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8310E
