NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• 4.9x more core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 275 MHz
• 14.6x more texture fill rate: 16.1 billion / sec vs 1.1 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 110 nm
• 12x more maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 128 MB
• 2.5x more memory clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 500 MHz
• 29.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1237 vs 42
• 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 257 vs 127

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285

• 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 50 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1237 42
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	257 127

Compare specifications (specs)