AMD Radeon HD 6370M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6370M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6370M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- 4.5x lower typical power consumption: 11 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 28% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 401 vs 255
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 26 November 2010 vs 3 September 2010 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 11 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 401 vs 255 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
- Around 80% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 750 MHz
- 2.7x more texture fill rate: 16.1 billion / sec vs 6 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 192 vs 80
- 4.3x better floating-point performance: 518.4 gflops vs 120 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 1 GB
- 4.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1213 vs 276
- Around 50% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4119 vs 2744
- 6.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.105 vs 0.171
- 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1699 vs 281
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2837 vs 1297
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 1885
- 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1699 vs 281
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2837 vs 1297
- Around 78% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 1885
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 750 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 16.1 billion / sec vs 6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 518.4 gflops vs 120 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1536 MB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1213 vs 276 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4119 vs 2744 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.105 vs 0.171 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1699 vs 281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2837 vs 1297 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 1885 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1699 vs 281 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2837 vs 1297 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 1885 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6370M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 6370M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 276 | 1213 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 401 | 255 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2744 | 4119 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.171 | 1.105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 281 | 1699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1297 | 2837 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1885 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 281 | 1699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1297 | 2837 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1885 | 3349 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.121 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 391.548 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.548 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 32.965 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 6370M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
Code name | Robson | GF106 |
Launch date | 26 November 2010 | 3 September 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1230 | 1231 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 120 gflops | 518.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 80 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 6 GTexel / s | 16.1 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 11 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 1,170 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1536 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 60.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus | ||
SLI |