NVIDIA GeForce 830M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 830M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 830M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 18.4 GTexel / s vs 16.1 billion / sec
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 256 vs 192
• Around 14% better floating-point performance: 588.8 gflops vs 518.4 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 52% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 50 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1536 MB
• Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1250 MHz
• Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4160 vs 4119
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 16.955 vs 11.121
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 67.443 vs 32.965
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1729 vs 1699
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3589 vs 2837
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1729 vs 1699
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3589 vs 2837

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M

• Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1082 MHz
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1207 vs 1008
• Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 253 vs 136
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 391.548 vs 156.544
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.105 vs 1.013
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.548 vs 17.81

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 830M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1008 1207
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	136 253
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4160 4119
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16.955 11.121
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	156.544 391.548
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.013 1.105
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17.81 18.548
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	67.443 32.965
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1729 1699
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3589 2837
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1729 1699
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3589 2837
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3349

Compare specifications (specs)