NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 vs ATI Radeon X1600 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 and ATI Radeon X1600 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 590 MHz
- 11.3x more texture fill rate: 26.7 billion / sec vs 2.36 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 90 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- Around 16% higher memory clock speed: 1603 MHz (3206 data rate) vs 1380 MHz
- 22.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2654 vs 116
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 465 vs 356
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3321 vs 1745
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3321 vs 1745
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 31 May 2010 vs 1 October 2007 |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 590 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 26.7 billion / sec vs 2.36 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 90 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1603 MHz (3206 data rate) vs 1380 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2654 vs 116 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 vs 356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3321 vs 1745 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3321 vs 1745 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X1600 XT
- 4.8x lower typical power consumption: 42 Watt vs 200 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 42 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X1600 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 | ATI Radeon X1600 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2654 | 116 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 | 356 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9600 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.079 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 741.303 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.516 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.513 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 64.492 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2999 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3660 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3321 | 1745 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2999 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3660 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3321 | 1745 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 | ATI Radeon X1600 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | R500 |
Code name | GF100 | RV530 |
Launch date | 31 May 2010 | 1 October 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
Place in performance rating | 824 | 825 |
Price now | $263.28 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 12.73 | |
Technical info |
||
Compute performance | 30x | |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | 590 MHz |
CUDA cores | 352 | |
Floating-point performance | 855.4 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 352 | |
Texture fill rate | 26.7 billion / sec | 2.36 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 42 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 157 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | Two Dual Link DVIMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pins | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.2 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 102.6 GB / s | 22.08 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1603 MHz (3206 data rate) | 1380 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |