NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 80% higher texture fill rate: 48.0 billion / sec vs 26.7 billion / sec
- 2.7x more pipelines: 960 vs 352
- Around 47% better floating-point performance: 1,256 gflops vs 855.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 200 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 12% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2779 vs 2654
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10654 vs 9600
- Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 36.241 vs 24.513
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4175 vs 2999
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4175 vs 2999
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 October 2012 vs 31 May 2010 |
| Texture fill rate | 48.0 billion / sec vs 26.7 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 960 vs 352 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,256 gflops vs 855.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 200 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1603 MHz (3206 data rate) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2779 vs 2654 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10654 vs 9600 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.241 vs 24.513 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4175 vs 2999 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 vs 3321 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4175 vs 2999 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 vs 3321 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
- 2x more core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 465 vs 371
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 19.079 vs 18.251
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 741.303 vs 665.068
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.516 vs 1.9
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 64.492 vs 62.895
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3660 vs 3383
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3660 vs 3383
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 vs 371 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.079 vs 18.251 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 741.303 vs 665.068 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.516 vs 1.9 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 64.492 vs 62.895 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3660 vs 3383 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3660 vs 3383 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2779 | 2654 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 371 | 465 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10654 | 9600 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.251 | 19.079 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 665.068 | 741.303 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.9 | 2.516 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.241 | 24.513 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.895 | 64.492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4175 | 2999 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3383 | 3660 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 | 3321 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4175 | 2999 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3383 | 3660 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 | 3321 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Code name | GK104 | GF100 |
| Launch date | 1 October 2012 | 31 May 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 829 | 832 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
| Price now | $263.28 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 12.73 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1215 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 960 | 352 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,256 gflops | 855.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 960 | 352 |
| Texture fill rate | 48.0 billion / sec | 26.7 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 200 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,100 million |
| Compute performance | 30x | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Two Dual Link DVIMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| SLI options | 2-way | 2-way3-way |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 6-pins |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB / s | 102.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1603 MHz (3206 data rate) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| FXAA | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| DSR | ||
| Surround | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 465
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX vs
AMDRadeon HD 6850
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460 v2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670MX
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX vs
AMDRadeon HD 7790
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX vs
NVIDIAQuadro K510M
