NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M vs AMD FireStream 9270
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M and AMD FireStream 9270 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 750 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 160 Watt
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1617 vs 1341
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 May 2010 vs 13 November 2008 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 750 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 160 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1617 vs 1341 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FireStream 9270
- Around 60% higher texture fill rate: 30 GTexel / s vs 18.7 billion / sec
- 2.3x more pipelines: 800 vs 352
- 2x better floating-point performance: 1,200.0 gflops vs 598.4 gflops
- 3x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 473 vs 458
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 30 GTexel / s vs 18.7 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 800 vs 352 |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops vs 598.4 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 473 vs 458 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M
GPU 2: AMD FireStream 9270
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M | AMD FireStream 9270 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1617 | 1341 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 458 | 473 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M | AMD FireStream 9270 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale |
Code name | GF100 | RV770 |
Launch date | 25 May 2010 | 13 November 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 296 | 294 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 750 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 598.4 gflops | 1,200.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 352 | 800 |
Texture fill rate | 18.7 billion / sec | 30 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 160 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 956 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB / s | 115.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |