NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1140 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 6855.6x more texture fill rate: 128.2 GTexel/s vs 18.7 billion / sec
- 4.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 352
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 1200 MHz
- 5.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8609 vs 1617
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 April 2019 vs 25 May 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 1140 MHz vs 850 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 128.2 GTexel/s vs 18.7 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 352 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 1200 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8609 vs 1617 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 458 vs 360
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 458 vs 360 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8609 | 1617 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 360 | 458 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 52263 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.93 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1919.95 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.6 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.964 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 492.867 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12301 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12301 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4903 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Fermi |
| Code name | TU116 | GF100 |
| Launch date | 23 April 2019 | 25 May 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 315 | 317 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1335 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1140 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 40 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 128.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.202 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.101 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 352 |
| Pixel fill rate | 64.08 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 128.2 GTexel/s | 18.7 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6600 million | 3,100 million |
| Floating-point performance | 598.4 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Laptop size | medium sized | large |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 API |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 76.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 1200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDFireStream 9270
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 480M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon R9 390
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 7100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX570A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
IntelArc A380
