AMD FirePro W4170M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W4170M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4170M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.9x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1026 MHz
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6460 vs 5750
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 28 April 2014 vs 15 March 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 192 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1026 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6460 vs 5750 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 825 MHz
- Around 33% higher texture fill rate: 28.8 billion / sec vs 21.6 GTexel / s
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1557 vs 1056
- Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 382 vs 211
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.461 vs 15.502
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3351 vs 2802
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3351 vs 2802
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3322 vs 2689
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3322 vs 2689
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 825 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 28.8 billion / sec vs 21.6 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1557 vs 1056 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 382 vs 211 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.461 vs 15.502 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3351 vs 2802 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3351 vs 2802 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3322 vs 2689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3322 vs 2689 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W4170M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD FirePro W4170M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1056 | 1557 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 211 | 382 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6460 | 5750 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.502 | 18.461 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2802 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2802 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2689 | 3322 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2689 | 3322 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.392 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.125 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.511 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 41.941 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2488 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2488 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 322 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD FirePro W4170M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | Mars | GF116 |
| Launch date | 28 April 2014 | 15 March 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 1016 | 1019 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Price now | $287.59 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 7.49 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s | 28.8 billion / sec |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,170 million |
| CUDA cores | 192 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 100 °C | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 116 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Two Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | One 6-pin |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 8.25" (21 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 98.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1026 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| Enduro | ||
| Powerplay | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||