AMD FirePro W4170M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W4170M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4170M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • 3.9x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1026 MHz
  • Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6460 vs 5772
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 28 April 2014 vs 15 March 2011
Pipelines 384 vs 192
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz vs 1026 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 6460 vs 5772

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti

  • 2.2x more core clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 825 MHz
  • Around 33% higher texture fill rate: 28.8 billion / sec vs 21.6 GTexel / s
  • Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1554 vs 1045
  • Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 377 vs 211
  • Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.461 vs 15.502
  • Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3351 vs 2802
  • Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3351 vs 2802
  • Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3322 vs 2689
  • Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3322 vs 2689
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1800 MHz vs 825 MHz
Texture fill rate 28.8 billion / sec vs 21.6 GTexel / s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1554 vs 1045
PassMark - G2D Mark 377 vs 211
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 18.461 vs 15.502
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3351 vs 2802
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3351 vs 2802
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3322 vs 2689
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3322 vs 2689

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro W4170M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1045
1554
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
211
377
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
6460
5772
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15.502
18.461
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2802
3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2802
3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2689
3322
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2689
3322
Name AMD FirePro W4170M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark 1045 1554
PassMark - G2D Mark 211 377
Geekbench - OpenCL 6460 5772
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 15.502 18.461
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2802 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2802 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2689 3322
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2689 3322
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 354.392
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.125
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 18.511
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 41.941
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2488
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2488
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 322

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD FirePro W4170M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Fermi 2.0
Code name Mars GF116
Launch date 28 April 2014 15 March 2011
Place in performance rating 1043 1046
Type Mobile workstation Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $149
Price now $287.59
Value for money (0-100) 7.49

Technical info

Boost clock speed 900 MHz
Core clock speed 825 MHz 1800 MHz
Floating-point performance 691.2 gflops 691.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 384 192
Texture fill rate 21.6 GTexel / s 28.8 billion / sec
Transistor count 1,040 million 1,170 million
CUDA cores 192
Maximum GPU temperature 100 °C
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 116 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs Two Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
Audio input for HDMI Internal
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized
Supplementary power connectors None One 6-pin
Bus support 16x PCI-E 2.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length 8.25" (21 cm)
SLI options 2-way

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.2

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 64 GB / s 98.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 192 Bit
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz 1026 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

AppAcceleration
Enduro
Powerplay
3D Vision
CUDA
DSR
SLI