NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 vs ATI Radeon E4690
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 and ATI Radeon E4690 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1464 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 43.9 billion / sec vs 19.2 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 480 vs 320
- 3.7x better floating-point performance: 1,405.4 gflops vs 384.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 2.5x more maximum memory size: 1280 MB vs 512 MB
- Around 36% higher memory clock speed: 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) vs 1400 MHz
- 9.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3928 vs 405
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 473 vs 347
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 vs 3302
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 vs 3302
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 December 2010 vs 1 June 2009 |
Core clock speed | 1464 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 43.9 billion / sec vs 19.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 480 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 1,405.4 gflops vs 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1280 MB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) vs 1400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3928 vs 405 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 473 vs 347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 vs 3302 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 vs 3302 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon E4690
- 7.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 219 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 219 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
GPU 2: ATI Radeon E4690
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 | ATI Radeon E4690 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3928 | 405 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 473 | 347 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13352 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.849 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 736.185 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.369 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.08 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 122.953 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4862 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3668 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 | 3302 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4862 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3668 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 | 3302 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 | ATI Radeon E4690 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | GF110 | RV730 |
Launch date | 7 December 2010 | 1 June 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Place in performance rating | 728 | 729 |
Price now | $99.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 48.11 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1464 MHz | 600 MHz |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,405.4 gflops | 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 480 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 43.9 billion / sec | 19.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 219 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 514 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | 3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.2 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1280 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 152.0 GB / s | 22.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 320 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |