NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 vs ATI Radeon E4690
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 and ATI Radeon E4690 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1464 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 43.9 billion / sec vs 19.2 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 480 vs 320
- 3.7x better floating-point performance: 1,405.4 gflops vs 384.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 2.5x more maximum memory size: 1280 MB vs 512 MB
- Around 36% higher memory clock speed: 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) vs 1400 MHz
- 9.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3927 vs 405
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 vs 347
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 vs 3302
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 vs 3302
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 December 2010 vs 1 June 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 1464 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 43.9 billion / sec vs 19.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 480 vs 320 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,405.4 gflops vs 384.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 1280 MB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) vs 1400 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3927 vs 405 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 vs 347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 vs 3302 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 vs 3302 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon E4690
- 7.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 219 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 219 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
GPU 2: ATI Radeon E4690
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 | ATI Radeon E4690 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3927 | 405 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 | 347 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13594 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.849 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 736.185 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.369 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.08 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 122.953 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4862 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3668 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 | 3302 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4862 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3668 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 | 3302 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 | ATI Radeon E4690 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale |
| Code name | GF110 | RV730 |
| Launch date | 7 December 2010 | 1 June 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
| Place in performance rating | 714 | 715 |
| Price now | $99.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 48.11 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1464 MHz | 600 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,405.4 gflops | 384.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
| Pipelines | 480 | 320 |
| Texture fill rate | 43.9 billion / sec | 19.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 219 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 514 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-II |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| SLI options | 3-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1280 MB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 152.0 GB / s | 22.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 320 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) | 1400 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570 vs
ATIRadeon X1650 PRO
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570 vs
ATIRadeon X550 XTX
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570 vs
ATIRadeon E4690
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6850 X2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 555
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570 vs
IntelArc Pro A40
