NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 640 vs 480
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.7x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 219 Watt
- Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1280 MB
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 520 vs 475
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 36.849
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 vs 122.953
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 February 2014 vs 7 December 2010 |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 480 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 219 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1280 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 520 vs 475 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 vs 36.849 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 vs 122.953 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 vs 3668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 vs 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 vs 3668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 vs 3325 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
- Around 44% higher core clock speed: 1464 MHz vs 1020 MHz
- Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 43.9 billion / sec vs 43.4 GTexel / s
- Around 1% better floating-point performance: 1,405.4 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
- 380x more memory clock speed: 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) vs 5.4 GB/s
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3932 vs 3899
- Around 17% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13435 vs 11515
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 736.185 vs 642.715
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.369 vs 2.933
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.08 vs 26.532
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1464 MHz vs 1020 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 43.9 billion / sec vs 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 1,405.4 gflops vs 1,389 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) vs 5.4 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3932 vs 3899 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13435 vs 11515 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 736.185 vs 642.715 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.369 vs 2.933 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.08 vs 26.532 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4862 vs 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4862 vs 4843 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3899 | 3932 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 520 | 475 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11515 | 13435 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 | 36.849 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 | 736.185 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 | 4.369 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 | 40.08 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 | 122.953 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 | 4862 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 3668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3329 | 3325 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 | 4862 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 3668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3329 | 3325 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 112 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | GM107 | GF110 |
| Launch date | 18 February 2014 | 7 December 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | $349 |
| Place in performance rating | 726 | 728 |
| Price now | $299.01 | $99.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.02 | 48.11 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | 1464 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 640 | 480 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 1,405.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 480 |
| Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s | 43.9 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 219 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,000 million |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | Internal |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 6-pin |
| SLI options | 3-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1280 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB / s | 152.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 320 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5.4 GB/s | 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
ATIRadeon E4690
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
AMDRadeon HD 6850 X2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
NVIDIATesla K80m
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
AMDRadeon E8950
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 Ti vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100
