AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- 5.4x more texture fill rate: 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 43.9 billion / sec
- 4x more pipelines: 2x 960 vs 480
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 2x 1,536.0 gflops vs 1,405.4 gflops
- 3.2x more maximum memory size: 2x 2 GB vs 1280 MB
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4200 MHz vs 1900 MHz (3800 data rate)
Launch date | 19 September 2011 vs 7 December 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 43.9 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2x 960 vs 480 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,536.0 gflops vs 1,405.4 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2x 2 GB vs 1280 MB |
Memory clock speed | 4200 MHz vs 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
- Around 83% higher core clock speed: 1464 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 16% lower typical power consumption: 219 Watt vs 254 Watt
- 3.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13327 vs 3977
- 5.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.369 vs 0.789
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 474 vs 373
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3928 vs 2534
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1464 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 219 Watt vs 254 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13327 vs 3977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.369 vs 0.789 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 474 vs 373 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3928 vs 2534 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3977 | 13327 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.789 | 4.369 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 373 | 474 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2534 | 3928 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.849 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 736.185 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.08 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 122.953 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4862 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3668 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4862 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3668 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 6850 X2 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Barts | GF110 |
Launch date | 19 September 2011 | 7 December 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 726 | 727 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Price now | $99.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 48.11 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 1464 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,536.0 gflops | 1,405.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 960 | 480 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec | 43.9 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 254 Watt | 219 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,700 million | 3,000 million |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | Two 6-pin |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | 3-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 2 GB | 1280 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 134.4 GB / s | 152.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2x 256 Bit | 320 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4200 MHz | 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |