NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 96% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 4.9x more texture fill rate: 78.4 billion / sec vs 16 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 960 vs 320
- 6.2x better floating-point performance: 1,981 gflops vs 320.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 10x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4013 vs 401
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 482 vs 320
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3365 vs 3262
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3365 vs 3262
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 6 September 2012 vs 9 January 2009 |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 78.4 billion / sec vs 16 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 960 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 1,981 gflops vs 320.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4013 vs 401 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 482 vs 320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 vs 3262 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 vs 3262 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 140 Watt
- 200x more memory clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 140 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4013 | 401 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 482 | 320 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11373 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.505 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.293 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.085 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.416 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.69 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3581 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 | 3262 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3581 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 | 3262 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1308 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
Code name | GK106 | M96 |
Launch date | 6 September 2012 | 9 January 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
Place in performance rating | 768 | 771 |
Price now | $349.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.35 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 500 MHz |
CUDA cores | 960 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,981 gflops | 320.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 960 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 78.4 billion / sec | 16 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 514 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 144.2 GB / s | 19.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192-bit GDDR5 | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI | ||
1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports have to be supported by the laptop manufacturer) | ||
DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600 | ||
HDMI support up to 1920x1080 (both with 7.1 AC3 Audio) | ||
PCI-E 2.0 x16 | ||
Powerplay |