NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 vs ATI Radeon HD 5850
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 and ATI Radeon HD 5850 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 725 MHz
- Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 725 MHz
- Around 50% higher texture fill rate: 78.4 billion / sec vs 52.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 8% lower typical power consumption: 140 Watt vs 151 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4013 vs 1970
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 482 vs 404
- Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.505 vs 16.467
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.085 vs 1.541
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 6 September 2012 vs 30 September 2009 |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 78.4 billion / sec vs 52.2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt vs 151 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4013 vs 1970 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 482 vs 404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.505 vs 16.467 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.085 vs 1.541 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 vs 3358 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5850
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 1440 vs 960
- Around 5% better floating-point performance: 2,088.0 gflops vs 1,981 gflops
- 666.7x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
- 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 33977 vs 11373
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1109.612 vs 705.293
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.08 vs 35.416
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3806 vs 3581
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3690
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3806 vs 3581
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3690
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1440 vs 960 |
Floating-point performance | 2,088.0 gflops vs 1,981 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33977 vs 11373 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1109.612 vs 705.293 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.08 vs 35.416 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3806 vs 3581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3806 vs 3581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3690 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5850
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | ATI Radeon HD 5850 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4013 | 1970 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 482 | 404 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11373 | 33977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.505 | 16.467 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.293 | 1109.612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.085 | 1.541 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.416 | 42.08 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.69 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3581 | 3806 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3581 | 3806 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1308 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | ATI Radeon HD 5850 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GK106 | Cypress |
Launch date | 6 September 2012 | 30 September 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | $299 |
Place in performance rating | 768 | 770 |
Price now | $349.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.35 | |
Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz | 725 MHz |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 725 MHz |
CUDA cores | 960 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,981 gflops | 2,088.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 960 | 1440 |
Texture fill rate | 78.4 billion / sec | 52.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 151 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 2,154 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | 241 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 144.2 GB / s | 128.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192-bit GDDR5 | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
AMD Eyefinity |