NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 and NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 73% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 567 MHz
- 24.6x more texture fill rate: 102.5 billion / sec vs 4.16 GTexel / s
- 84x more pipelines: 1344 vs 16
- 62.5x better floating-point performance: 2,459.5 gflops vs 39.36 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 1023
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 1023
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 May 2012 vs 4 December 2007 |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 567 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 102.5 billion / sec vs 4.16 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1344 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 2,459.5 gflops vs 39.36 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 1023 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 1023 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI
- 6.8x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 170 Watt
- 111x more memory clock speed: 666 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 666 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 | NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5345 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 537 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15511 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.613 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 971.208 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.281 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.404 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 86.208 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7038 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 1023 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7038 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 1023 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1839 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 | NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Tesla |
Code name | GK104 | G98 |
Launch date | 10 May 2012 | 4 December 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Place in performance rating | 554 | 1650 |
Price now | $474.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.20 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 567 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,459.5 gflops | 39.36 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 1344 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 102.5 billion / sec | 4.16 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCI |
Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | 170 mm |
SLI options | 3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.2 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | 8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256-bit GDDR5 | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | 666 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |