NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX vs AMD Radeon HD 6850

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX and AMD Radeon HD 6850 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 29% higher texture fill rate: 48.0 billion / sec vs 37.2 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 127 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2717 vs 1965
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.251 vs 13.033
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.9 vs 1.333
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 36.241 vs 32.609
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4175 vs 3489
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4175 vs 3489

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6850

• Around 18% better floating-point performance: 1,488.0 gflops vs 1,256 gflops
• Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 432 vs 371
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 946.933 vs 665.068
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 139.45 vs 62.895
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 3383
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 3383

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6850

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2717 1965
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	371 432
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.251 13.033
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	665.068 946.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.9 1.333
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	36.241 32.609
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	62.895 139.45
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4175 3489
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3383 3708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3334 3348
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4175 3489
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3383 3708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3334 3348

Compare specifications (specs)