NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX versus AMD Radeon HD 6850
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX and AMD Radeon HD 6850 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 29% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 48.0 billion / sec versus 37.2 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 27% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 127 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2717 versus 1964
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.251 versus 13.033
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.9 versus 1.333
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 36.241 versus 32.609
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4175 versus 3489
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4175 versus 3489
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 October 2012 versus 21 October 2010 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 48.0 billion / sec versus 37.2 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 127 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2717 versus 1964 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.251 versus 13.033 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.9 versus 1.333 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.241 versus 32.609 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4175 versus 3489 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4175 versus 3489 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6850
- Environ 18% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,488.0 gflops versus 1,256 gflops
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 433 versus 371
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 946.933 versus 665.068
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 139.45 versus 62.895
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 versus 3383
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 versus 3383
| Caractéristiques | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,488.0 gflops versus 1,256 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 433 versus 371 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 946.933 versus 665.068 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 139.45 versus 62.895 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 versus 3383 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 versus 3334 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 versus 3383 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 versus 3334 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6850
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX | AMD Radeon HD 6850 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2717 | 1964 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 371 | 433 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10758 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.251 | 13.033 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 665.068 | 946.933 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.9 | 1.333 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.241 | 32.609 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.895 | 139.45 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4175 | 3489 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3383 | 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 | 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4175 | 3489 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3383 | 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 | 3348 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX | AMD Radeon HD 6850 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | GK104 | Barts |
| Date de sortie | 1 October 2012 | 21 October 2010 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 838 | 841 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $179 | |
| Prix maintenant | $99.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 28.63 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 600 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 960 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,256 gflops | 1,488.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 960 | 960 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 48.0 billion / sec | 37.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 127 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 1,700 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | AGP |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 2-way | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Longeur | 198 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 11 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 115.2 GB / s | 128.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| FXAA | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX vs
AMDRadeon HD 6850
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460 v2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX vs
AMDRadeon HD 7790
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675MX vs
AMDRadeon HD 8210E
