AMD Radeon HD 7790 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7790 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7790
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 67% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 56 GTexel / s vs 48.0 billion / sec
- Around 43% better floating-point performance: 1,792 gflops vs 1,256 gflops
- Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3090 vs 2717
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 459 vs 371
- Around 37% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14832 vs 10789
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.763 vs 18.251
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 828.247 vs 665.068
- Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.646 vs 1.9
- Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 63.284 vs 36.241
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 217.744 vs 62.895
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5087 vs 4175
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5087 vs 4175
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 March 2013 vs 1 October 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 56 GTexel / s vs 48.0 billion / sec |
Floating-point performance | 1,792 gflops vs 1,256 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3090 vs 2717 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 459 vs 371 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14832 vs 10789 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.763 vs 18.251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 828.247 vs 665.068 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.646 vs 1.9 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 63.284 vs 36.241 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 217.744 vs 62.895 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5087 vs 4175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5087 vs 4175 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
- Around 7% higher pipelines: 960 vs 896
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3383 vs 988
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3334 vs 2061
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3383 vs 988
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3334 vs 2061
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 960 vs 896 |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3383 vs 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 vs 2061 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3383 vs 988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 vs 2061 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7790
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon HD 7790 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3090 | 2717 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 459 | 371 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14832 | 10789 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.763 | 18.251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 828.247 | 665.068 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.646 | 1.9 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 63.284 | 36.241 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 217.744 | 62.895 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5087 | 4175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 988 | 3383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2061 | 3334 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5087 | 4175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 988 | 3383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2061 | 3334 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon HD 7790 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Bonaire | GK104 |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Launch date | 22 March 2013 | 1 October 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Place in performance rating | 837 | 838 |
Price now | $134.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 29.57 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,792 gflops | 1,256 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 960 |
Texture fill rate | 56 GTexel / s | 48.0 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 3,540 million |
CUDA cores | 960 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
VGA | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 183 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 115.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
FXAA | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |