NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 48.0 billion / sec vs 43.6 GTexel / s
• 2.9x more pipelines: 960 vs 336
• Around 20% better floating-point performance: 1,256 gflops vs 1,045.6 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 160 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2745 vs 1872
• Around 37% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10766 vs 7872
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4175 vs 3537
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3334 vs 3117
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4175 vs 3537
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3334 vs 3117

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2

• Around 30% higher core clock speed: 778 MHz vs 600 MHz
• 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4008 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 418 vs 382
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.161 vs 18.251
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 781.734 vs 665.068
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.125 vs 1.9
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 47.218 vs 36.241
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 75.212 vs 62.895

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2745 1872
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	382 418
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	10766 7872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.251 22.161
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	665.068 781.734
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.9 2.125
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	36.241 47.218
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	62.895 75.212
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4175 3537
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3383 3398
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3334 3117
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4175 3537
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3383 3398
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3334 3117

Compare specifications (specs)