NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 48.0 billion / sec vs 43.6 GTexel / s
- 2.9x more pipelines: 960 vs 336
- Around 20% better floating-point performance: 1,256 gflops vs 1,045.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 160 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2717 vs 1872
- Around 37% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10789 vs 7872
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4175 vs 3537
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3334 vs 3117
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4175 vs 3537
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3334 vs 3117
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 October 2012 vs 24 September 2011 |
Texture fill rate | 48.0 billion / sec vs 43.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 960 vs 336 |
Floating-point performance | 1,256 gflops vs 1,045.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 160 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2717 vs 1872 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10789 vs 7872 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4175 vs 3537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 vs 3117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4175 vs 3537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 vs 3117 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 778 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4008 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 418 vs 371
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.161 vs 18.251
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 781.734 vs 665.068
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.125 vs 1.9
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 47.218 vs 36.241
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 75.212 vs 62.895
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 778 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 418 vs 371 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.161 vs 18.251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 781.734 vs 665.068 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.125 vs 1.9 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 47.218 vs 36.241 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 75.212 vs 62.895 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3398 vs 3383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3398 vs 3383 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2717 | 1872 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 371 | 418 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10789 | 7872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.251 | 22.161 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 665.068 | 781.734 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.9 | 2.125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.241 | 47.218 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.895 | 75.212 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4175 | 3537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3383 | 3398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 | 3117 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4175 | 3537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3383 | 3398 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 | 3117 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | GK104 | GF114 |
Launch date | 1 October 2012 | 24 September 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 838 | 839 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Price now | $199.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.01 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 778 MHz |
CUDA cores | 960 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,256 gflops | 1,045.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 960 | 336 |
Texture fill rate | 48.0 billion / sec | 43.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 160 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,950 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Length | 210 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB / s | 96.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 4008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
FXAA | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |