NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX vs AMD Radeon HD 6870

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX and AMD Radeon HD 6870 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 51% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 151 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 71% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2717 vs 2217
• 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10789 vs 4950
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.251 vs 16.41
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.9 vs 1.346

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6870

• Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 50.4 GTexel / s vs 48.0 billion / sec
• Around 17% higher pipelines: 1120 vs 960
• Around 61% better floating-point performance: 2,016.0 gflops vs 1,256 gflops
• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 411 vs 371
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 857.798 vs 665.068
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.514 vs 36.241
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 184.41 vs 62.895
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4238 vs 4175
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3711 vs 3383
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4238 vs 4175
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3711 vs 3383

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6870

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2717 2217
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	371 411
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	10789 4950
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.251 16.41
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	665.068 857.798
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.9 1.346
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	36.241 45.514
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	62.895 184.41
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4175 4238
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3383 3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3334 3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4175 4238
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3383 3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3334 3349

Compare specifications (specs)