NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX vs AMD Radeon HD 6870
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX and AMD Radeon HD 6870 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 51% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 151 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 71% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2717 vs 2216
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10767 vs 4950
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.251 vs 16.41
- Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.9 vs 1.346
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 October 2012 vs 21 October 2010 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 151 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2717 vs 2216 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10767 vs 4950 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.251 vs 16.41 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.9 vs 1.346 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6870
- Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 50.4 GTexel / s vs 48.0 billion / sec
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 1120 vs 960
- Around 61% better floating-point performance: 2,016.0 gflops vs 1,256 gflops
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 410 vs 371
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 857.798 vs 665.068
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.514 vs 36.241
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 184.41 vs 62.895
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4238 vs 4175
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3711 vs 3383
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4238 vs 4175
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3711 vs 3383
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 50.4 GTexel / s vs 48.0 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1120 vs 960 |
Floating-point performance | 2,016.0 gflops vs 1,256 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 410 vs 371 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 857.798 vs 665.068 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.514 vs 36.241 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.41 vs 62.895 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4238 vs 4175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 vs 3383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 3334 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4238 vs 4175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 vs 3383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 3334 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6870
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX | AMD Radeon HD 6870 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2717 | 2216 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 371 | 410 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10767 | 4950 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.251 | 16.41 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 665.068 | 857.798 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.9 | 1.346 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.241 | 45.514 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.895 | 184.41 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4175 | 4238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3383 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4175 | 4238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3383 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 | 3349 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX | AMD Radeon HD 6870 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GK104 | Barts |
Launch date | 1 October 2012 | 21 October 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 837 | 840 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $239 | |
Price now | $89.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 38.38 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 960 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,256 gflops | 2,016.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 960 | 1120 |
Texture fill rate | 48.0 billion / sec | 50.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 151 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,700 million |
Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Length | 220 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 11 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB / s | 134.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
FXAA | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire |