NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX vs AMD Radeon HD 7610M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX and AMD Radeon HD 7610M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 60% higher core clock speed: 720 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 10.2x more texture fill rate: 92.2 billion / sec vs 9 GTexel / s
- 3.8x more pipelines: 1536 vs 400
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 56% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 5.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3686 vs 632
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12247 vs 5257
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3571 vs 2632
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3571 vs 2632
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 October 2012 vs 7 January 2012 |
Core clock speed | 720 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion / sec vs 9 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 400 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3686 vs 632 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12247 vs 5257 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3571 vs 2632 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3571 vs 2632 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7610M
- 6.1x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 122 Watt
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 479 vs 453
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 122 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 479 vs 453 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 vs 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 vs 3336 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7610M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX | AMD Radeon HD 7610M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3686 | 632 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 453 | 479 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12247 | 5257 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.421 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 734.936 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.31 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.434 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 56.706 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3571 | 2632 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 3339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3571 | 2632 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 3339 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX | AMD Radeon HD 7610M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Launch date | 23 October 2012 | 7 January 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 683 | 685 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Code name | Whistler | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 720 MHz | 450 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 400 |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion / sec | 9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 3540 Million | 716 million |
Floating-point performance | 360.0 gflops | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | medium sized |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
FXAA | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs |