NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX vs AMD FirePro S9000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX and AMD FirePro S9000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
• 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 122 Watt vs 350 Watt
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.421 vs 9.541
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 734.936 vs 275.278
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.31 vs 1.886
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.434 vs 30.049

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S9000

• Around 25% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 720 MHz
• Around 9% higher texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel / s vs 92.2 billion / sec
• Around 17% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1536
• 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
• 2.2x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 2500 MHz
• Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5059 vs 3686
• Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 561 vs 453
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 91.842 vs 56.706
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 vs 3571
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3336
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 vs 3571
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3336

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S9000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3686 5059
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	453 561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.421 9.541
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	734.936 275.278
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.31 1.886
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.434 30.049
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	56.706 91.842
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3571 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3571 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3357

Compare specifications (specs)