NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3430
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3430 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2x more core clock speed: 915 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 130x more texture fill rate: 234 billion / sec vs 1.8 GTexel / s
- 76.8x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 40
- 173.9x better floating-point performance: 2x 3,130 gflops vs 36 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 vs 256 MB
- 7.5x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 57x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5590 vs 98
- Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 465 vs 260
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 May 2012 vs 25 July 2008 |
Core clock speed | 915 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 234 billion / sec vs 1.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 vs 40 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,130 gflops vs 36 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5590 vs 98 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 vs 260 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3430
- 25x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 300 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3430
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3430 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5590 | 98 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 | 260 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16270 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.352 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 930.114 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.656 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.836 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.861 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6875 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1849 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1673 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6875 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1849 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1673 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3430 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
Code name | GK104 | M82 |
Launch date | 3 May 2012 | 25 July 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Place in performance rating | 737 | 645 |
Price now | $999 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.01 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1019 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 915 MHz | 450 MHz |
CUDA cores | 3072 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,130 gflops | 36 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 | 40 |
Texture fill rate | 234 billion / sec | 1.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 12 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 181 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort, Two Dual Link DVI-I. One Dual link DVI-D. One Mini... | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Length | 11.0" (27.9 cm) | |
SLI options | Quad | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.2 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 384 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 512-bit (256-bit per GPU) | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR2 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |