NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 vs ATI Radeon HD 4770
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 and ATI Radeon HD 4770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 915 MHz vs 750 MHz
- 9.8x more texture fill rate: 234 billion / sec vs 24 GTexel / s
- 4.8x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 640
- 6.5x better floating-point performance: 2x 3,130 gflops vs 960.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 vs 512 MB
- Around 88% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 3200 MHz
- 6.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5590 vs 908
- 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 465 vs 120
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 May 2012 vs 28 April 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 915 MHz vs 750 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 234 billion / sec vs 24 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2x 1536 vs 640 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 3,130 gflops vs 960.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 3200 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5590 vs 908 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 vs 120 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4770
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8618 vs 1673
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8618 vs 1673
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 300 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8618 vs 1673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8618 vs 1673 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4770
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 | ATI Radeon HD 4770 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5590 | 908 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 | 120 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16270 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.352 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 930.114 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.656 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.836 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.861 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6875 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1849 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1673 | 8618 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6875 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1849 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1673 | 8618 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 | ATI Radeon HD 4770 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
| Code name | GK104 | RV740 |
| Launch date | 3 May 2012 | 28 April 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $109 |
| Place in performance rating | 735 | 737 |
| Price now | $999 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 7.01 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1019 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 915 MHz | 750 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 3072 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 3,130 gflops | 960.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 2x 1536 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 234 billion / sec | 24 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 826 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort, Two Dual Link DVI-I. One Dual link DVI-D. One Mini... | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 11.0" (27.9 cm) | 203 mm |
| SLI options | Quad | |
| Supplementary power connectors | Two 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 384 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 512-bit (256-bit per GPU) | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 690 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X2500
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 690 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4770
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 690 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 480
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 690 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 690 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 830A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 690 vs
AMDRadeon E8950
