NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 465 vs 462
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1029.267 vs 930.114
- Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.894 vs 29.836
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 1849
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 vs 1673
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 1849
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 vs 1673
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 August 2012 vs 3 May 2012 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 vs 462 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1029.267 vs 930.114 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.894 vs 29.836 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 vs 1849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 vs 1673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 vs 1849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 vs 1673 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1019 MHz vs 980 MHz
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 234 billion / sec vs 102.5 billion / sec
- 2.3x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 1344
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 2x 3,130 gflops vs 2,459.5 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 vs 2 GB
- 1001.3x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5516 vs 4422
- Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16608 vs 15315
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.352 vs 36.256
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.656 vs 3.037
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.861 vs 82.191
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6875 vs 3285
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6875 vs 3285
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1019 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 234 billion / sec vs 102.5 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 vs 1344 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,130 gflops vs 2,459.5 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5516 vs 4422 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16608 vs 15315 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.352 vs 36.256 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.656 vs 3.037 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.861 vs 82.191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6875 vs 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6875 vs 3285 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4422 | 5516 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 | 462 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15315 | 16608 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.256 | 46.352 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1029.267 | 930.114 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.037 | 3.656 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.894 | 29.836 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.191 | 97.861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3285 | 6875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | 1849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | 1673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3285 | 6875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | 1849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | 1673 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1616 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | GK104 | GK104 |
Launch date | 16 August 2012 | 3 May 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | $999 |
Place in performance rating | 745 | 746 |
Price now | $321.99 | $999 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.34 | 7.01 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | 1019 MHz |
Core clock speed | 915 MHz | 915 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1344 | 3072 |
Floating-point performance | 2,459.5 gflops | 2x 3,130 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1344 | 2x 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 102.5 billion / sec | 234 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | Internal |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | 3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort, Two Dual Link DVI-I. One Dual link DVI-D. One Mini... |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | 11.0" (27.9 cm) |
SLI options | 3-way | Quad |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | Two 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 144.2 GB / s | 384 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192-bit GDDR5 | 512-bit (256-bit per GPU) |
Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |