NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM vs Intel HD Graphics 4000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM and Intel HD Graphics 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 59% higher core clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 650 MHz
• 5.9x more texture fill rate: 24.79 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
• 24x more pipelines: 384 vs 16
• 23.6x better floating-point performance: 793.3 gflops vs 33.6 gflops
• 6.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2135 vs 347
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 475 vs 194
• 11.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6108 vs 538
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.117 vs 8.712
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 335.835 vs 155.638
• Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.651 vs 0.931
• 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.096 vs 7.36
• 8.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.126 vs 12.009
• 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2918 vs 754
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1813 vs 1492
• Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 2392
• 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2918 vs 754
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1813 vs 1492
• Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 2392

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000

• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 55 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2135 347
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	475 194
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6108 538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.117 8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	335.835 155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.651 0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.096 7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	97.126 12.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2918 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1813 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 2392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2918 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1813 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 2392

Compare specifications (specs)