NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM versus Intel HD Graphics 4000

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM and Intel HD Graphics 4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM

versus

Intel HD Graphics 4000

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 9 mois plus tard
Environ 59% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1033 MHz versus 650 MHz
times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 24.79 GTexel / s versus 4.2 GTexel / s
24x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 16
23.6x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 793.3 gflops versus 33.6 gflops
6.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2135 versus 347
2.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 475 versus 194
11.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 6108 versus 538
2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.117 versus 8.712
2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 335.835 versus 155.638
Environ 77% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.651 versus 0.931
3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.096 versus 7.36
8.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.126 versus 12.009
3.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2918 versus 754
Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1813 versus 1492
Environ 38% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 versus 2392
3.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2918 versus 754
Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1813 versus 1492
Environ 38% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 versus 2392

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	18 February 2014 versus 14 May 2012
Vitesse du noyau	1033 MHz versus 650 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture	24.79 GTexel / s versus 4.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	384 versus 16
Performance á point flottant	793.3 gflops versus 33.6 gflops
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	2135 versus 347
PassMark - G2D Mark	475 versus 194
Geekbench - OpenCL	6108 versus 538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	24.117 versus 8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	335.835 versus 155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.651 versus 0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	27.096 versus 7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	97.126 versus 12.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2918 versus 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1813 versus 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3309 versus 2392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2918 versus 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1813 versus 1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3309 versus 2392

Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4000

Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 28 nm
Environ 22% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 55 Watt

Processus de fabrication	22 nm versus 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt versus 55 Watt

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2135

347

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

475

194

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

6108

538

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

24.117

8.712

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

335.835

155.638

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.651

0.931

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

27.096

7.36

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

97.126

12.009

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2918

754

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1813

1492

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3309

2392

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2918

754

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1813

1492

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3309

2392

Nom	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM	Intel HD Graphics 4000
PassMark - G3D Mark	2135	347
PassMark - G2D Mark	475	194
Geekbench - OpenCL	6108	538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	24.117	8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	335.835	155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.651	0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	27.096	7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	97.126	12.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2918	754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1813	1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3309	2392
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2918	754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1813	1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3309	2392
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	655	0

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM	Intel HD Graphics 4000
Essentiel
Architecture	Maxwell	Generation 7.0
Nom de code	GM107	Ivy Bridge GT2
Date de sortie	18 February 2014	14 May 2012
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	979	1501
Genre	Desktop	Laptop
Infos techniques
Vitesse du noyau	1033 MHz	650 MHz
Performance á point flottant	793.3 gflops	33.6 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm	22 nm
Pipelines	384	16
Taux de remplissage de la texture	24.79 GTexel / s	4.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt	45 Watt
Compte de transistor	1,870 million	1,200 million
Vitesse augmenté		1050 MHz
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	No outputs
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Longeur	145 mm
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	None
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	11.1 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.0
Mémoire
RAM maximale	4 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	28.8 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	128 Bit	64 / 128 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	1800 MHz
Genre de mémoire	DDR3
Mémoire partagé		1
Technologies
Quick Sync