NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
• Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 980 MHz
• Around 5% better floating-point performance: 793.3 gflops vs 752.6 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2135 vs 1695
• Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 472 vs 325
• Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6113 vs 4933
• Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.117 vs 12.449
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.651 vs 1.295
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.096 vs 24.566
• 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.126 vs 28.025

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

• Around 27% higher texture fill rate: 31.36 GTexel / s vs 24.79 GTexel / s
• Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 55 Watt
• 3x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 455.796 vs 335.835
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3093 vs 2918
• Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3504 vs 1813
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 vs 3309
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3093 vs 2918
• Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3504 vs 1813
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 vs 3309
• 3.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2148 vs 655

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2135 1695
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	472 325
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6113 4933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.117 12.449
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	335.835 455.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.651 1.295
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.096 24.566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	97.126 28.025
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2918 3093
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1813 3504
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3344
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2918 3093
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1813 3504
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3344
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	655 2148

Compare specifications (specs)