NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 5% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1033 MHz versus 980 MHz
- Environ 5% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 793.3 gflops versus 752.6 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2135 versus 1695
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 472 versus 325
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 6113 versus 4933
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.117 versus 12.449
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.651 versus 1.295
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.096 versus 24.566
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.126 versus 28.025
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 February 2014 versus 25 June 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1033 MHz versus 980 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 793.3 gflops versus 752.6 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2135 versus 1695 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 472 versus 325 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6113 versus 4933 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.117 versus 12.449 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.651 versus 1.295 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.096 versus 24.566 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.126 versus 28.025 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
- Environ 27% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 31.36 GTexel / s versus 24.79 GTexel / s
- Environ 10% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 55 Watt
- 3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5400 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 455.796 versus 335.835
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3093 versus 2918
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3504 versus 1813
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 versus 3309
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3093 versus 2918
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3504 versus 1813
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 versus 3309
- 3.3x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2148 versus 655
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 31.36 GTexel / s versus 24.79 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 55 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5400 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 455.796 versus 335.835 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3093 versus 2918 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3504 versus 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 versus 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3093 versus 2918 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3504 versus 1813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 versus 3309 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2148 versus 655 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2135 | 1695 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 472 | 325 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6113 | 4933 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.117 | 12.449 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 335.835 | 455.796 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.651 | 1.295 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.096 | 24.566 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 97.126 | 28.025 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2918 | 3093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1813 | 3504 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2918 | 3093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1813 | 3504 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3344 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 655 | 2148 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Nom de code | GM107 | GK107 |
Date de sortie | 18 February 2014 | 25 June 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 988 | 990 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 1033 MHz | 980 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 793.3 gflops | 752.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 24.79 GTexel / s | 31.36 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 50 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 1,270 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | 86.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 5400 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |