NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• 2.2x more core clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 475 MHz
• Around 63% higher texture fill rate: 24.79 GTexel / s vs 15.2 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
• Around 63% better floating-point performance: 793.3 gflops vs 486.4 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 142 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2135 vs 1476
• Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 475 vs 382
• Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6108 vs 5013
• Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.117 vs 13.345
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 335.835 vs 306.122
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.651 vs 1.552
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.096 vs 20.453
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 97.126 vs 39.651
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2918 vs 2079
• Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2918 vs 2079

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 4000

• Around 56% higher memory clock speed: 2808 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3472 vs 1813
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 3309
• Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3472 vs 1813
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 3309

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 4000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2135 1476
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	475 382
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6108 5013
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.117 13.345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	335.835 306.122
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.651 1.552
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.096 20.453
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	97.126 39.651
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2918 2079
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1813 3472
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2918 2079
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1813 3472
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3350

Compare specifications (specs)