NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 46% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 700 MHz
- Around 7% higher pipelines: 512 vs 480
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4.5x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 511 vs 444
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32 vs 30.405
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 vs 3658
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 3320
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 vs 3658
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 3320
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 February 2014 vs 26 March 2010 |
Core clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Pipelines | 512 vs 480 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 511 vs 444 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32 vs 30.405 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 vs 3658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 vs 3658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3320 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
- Around 21% higher texture fill rate: 42 billion / sec vs 34.72 GTexel / s
- Around 21% better floating-point performance: 1,345.0 gflops vs 1,111 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 1 GB
- 369.6x more memory clock speed: 1848 MHz (3696 data rate) vs 5.0 GB/s
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4108 vs 3341
- Around 42% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13144 vs 9266
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.483 vs 34.239
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 706.104 vs 639.427
- Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.245 vs 2.341
- Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 106.875 vs 69.814
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5110 vs 4498
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5110 vs 4498
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 42 billion / sec vs 34.72 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 1,345.0 gflops vs 1,111 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1536 MB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1848 MHz (3696 data rate) vs 5.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4108 vs 3341 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13144 vs 9266 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.483 vs 34.239 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 706.104 vs 639.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.245 vs 2.341 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 106.875 vs 69.814 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5110 vs 4498 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5110 vs 4498 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3341 | 4108 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 511 | 444 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9266 | 13144 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.239 | 34.483 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 639.427 | 706.104 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.341 | 4.245 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32 | 30.405 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.814 | 106.875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4498 | 5110 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | 3658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4498 | 5110 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | 3658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3320 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1051 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
Code name | GM107 | GF100 |
Launch date | 18 February 2014 | 26 March 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $119 | $499 |
Place in performance rating | 751 | 752 |
Price now | $150.99 | $71.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.54 | 61.35 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | 700 MHz |
CUDA cores | 512 | 480 |
Floating-point performance | 1,111 gflops | 1,345.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | 105 °C |
Pipelines | 512 | 480 |
Texture fill rate | 34.72 GTexel / s | 42 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | Internal |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin & 8-pin |
SLI options | 2-way, 3-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1536 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | 177.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5.0 GB/s | 1848 MHz (3696 data rate) |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
SLI |