NVIDIA GRID K220Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K220Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GRID K220Q

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K220Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
2.7x more texture fill rate: 95.36 GTexel / s vs 34.72 GTexel / s
3x more pipelines: 1536 vs 512
2.1x better floating-point performance: 2,289 gflops vs 1,111 gflops
1000x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 539 vs 504

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	2 July 2014 vs 18 February 2014
Texture fill rate	95.36 GTexel / s vs 34.72 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1536 vs 512
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops vs 1,111 gflops
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	539 vs 504

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 745 MHz
4.1x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 225 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
3.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3354 vs 912
5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4498 vs 833
5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4498 vs 833
Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 vs 2128
Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 vs 2128
Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 2660
Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 2660

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1020 MHz vs 745 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt vs 225 Watt
Maximum memory size	1 GB vs 512 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3354 vs 912
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4498 vs 833
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4498 vs 833
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3704 vs 2128
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3704 vs 2128
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3346 vs 2660
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3346 vs 2660

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K220Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

912

3354

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

539

504

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

833

4498

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

833

4498

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2128

3704

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2128

3704

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2660

3346

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2660

3346

Name	NVIDIA GRID K220Q	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
PassMark - G3D Mark	912	3354
PassMark - G2D Mark	539	504
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	833	4498
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	833	4498
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2128	3704
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2128	3704
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2660	3346
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2660	3346
Geekbench - OpenCL		9392
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		34.239
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		639.427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		2.341
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		32
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		69.814
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		1048

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GRID K220Q	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell
Code name	GK104	GM107
Launch date	2 July 2014	18 February 2014
Launch price (MSRP)	$469	$119
Place in performance rating	753	754
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Price now		$150.99
Value for money (0-100)		27.54
Technical info
Core clock speed	745 MHz	1020 MHz
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops	1,111 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1536	512
Texture fill rate	95.36 GTexel / s	34.72 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	225 Watt	55 Watt
Transistor count	3,540 million	1,870 million
Boost clock speed		1085 MHz
CUDA cores		512
Maximum GPU temperature		95 °C
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini...
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		5.7" (14.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB / s	80 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	5.0 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Technologies
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
TXAA