NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2.7x more texture fill rate: 85.25 GTexel / s vs 31.2 billion / sec
- 4x more pipelines: 1152 vs 288
- 2.7x better floating-point performance: 2,046 gflops vs 748.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 1 GB
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 1700 MHz
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 3491
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 3491
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3108
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3108
- Around 80% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11808 vs 6569
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 June 2013 vs 15 November 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 85.25 GTexel / s vs 31.2 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1152 vs 288 |
Floating-point performance | 2,046 gflops vs 748.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1536 MB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz vs 1700 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 3491 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 3491 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3108 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3108 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11808 vs 6569 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE
- Around 58% higher core clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 823 MHz
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 823 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3491 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3491 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3108 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3108 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11808 | 6569 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1333 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1985 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 359 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.62 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 635.018 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.755 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.476 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 48.203 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3044 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3044 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | GK104 | GF104 |
Launch date | 27 June 2013 | 15 November 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 940 | 942 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $160 | |
Price now | $159.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.95 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 888 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 823 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,046 gflops | 748.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1152 | 288 |
Texture fill rate | 85.25 GTexel / s | 31.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,950 million |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 104 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, 2 x Dual-Link DVI-I1 x Mini HDMI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 6-pin & 6-pin |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 134.4 GB / s | 108.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |