NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs ATI Radeon E2400
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and ATI Radeon E2400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 53% higher core clock speed: 915 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 45.8x more texture fill rate: 109.8 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s
- 33.6x more pipelines: 1344 vs 40
- 54.9x better floating-point performance: 2,634 gflops vs 48 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 128 MB
- 4.3x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- 102.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5328 vs 52
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 575 vs 287
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 September 2013 vs 28 June 2007 |
Core clock speed | 915 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 109.8 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1344 vs 40 |
Floating-point performance | 2,634 gflops vs 48 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5328 vs 52 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 575 vs 287 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon E2400
- 6.8x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 170 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
GPU 2: ATI Radeon E2400
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | ATI Radeon E2400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5328 | 52 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 575 | 287 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14380 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.336 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1351.496 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.121 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.14 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 156.419 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | ATI Radeon E2400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
Code name | GK104 | RV610 |
Launch date | 27 September 2013 | 28 June 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 575 | 578 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 915 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,634 gflops | 48 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 1344 | 40 |
Texture fill rate | 109.8 GTexel / s | 2.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 180 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.3 GB / s | 11.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |