NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 vs AMD Radeon HD 7970M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 and AMD Radeon HD 7970M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 850 MHz
- Around 38% higher texture fill rate: 94.1 billion / sec vs 68 GTexel / s
- Around 9% better floating-point performance: 2,378 gflops vs 2,176 gflops
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 4800 MHz
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4791 vs 3529
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 527 vs 506
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6927 vs 5094
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3692
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3339
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6927 vs 5094
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3692
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3339
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 25 June 2013 vs 24 April 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 850 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 94.1 billion / sec vs 68 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 2,378 gflops vs 2,176 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 4800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4791 vs 3529 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 527 vs 506 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6927 vs 5094 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3692 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6927 vs 5094 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3692 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3339 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7970M
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1152
- Around 70% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 170 Watt
- Around 57% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22410 vs 14254
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 51.181 vs 37.505
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1121.002 vs 864.402
- Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.355 vs 3.09
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 81.527 vs 40.457
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 256.99 vs 84.186
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1280 vs 1152 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 170 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 22410 vs 14254 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 51.181 vs 37.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1121.002 vs 864.402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.355 vs 3.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 81.527 vs 40.457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 256.99 vs 84.186 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7970M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | AMD Radeon HD 7970M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4791 | 3529 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 527 | 506 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14254 | 22410 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.505 | 51.181 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 864.402 | 1121.002 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.09 | 5.355 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.457 | 81.527 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.186 | 256.99 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6927 | 5094 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3692 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6927 | 5094 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3692 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3339 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1663 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | AMD Radeon HD 7970M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GK104 | Wimbledon |
| Launch date | 25 June 2013 | 24 April 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
| Place in performance rating | 589 | 590 |
| Price now | $249.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 23.69 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 850 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1152 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,378 gflops | 2,176 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
| Pipelines | 1152 | 1280 |
| Texture fill rate | 94.1 billion / sec | 68 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 2,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| Minimum recommended system power | 500 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | None |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | 153.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| PhysX | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder X1800 XL
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7350 LE
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4730
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 vs
ATIFirePro M7740
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7970M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4100
