NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 vs ATI FirePro M7740
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 and ATI FirePro M7740 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 51% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 4.5x more texture fill rate: 94.1 billion / sec vs 20.8 GTexel / s
- Around 80% higher pipelines: 1152 vs 640
- 2.9x better floating-point performance: 2,378 gflops vs 832.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 3384 MHz
- 7.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4794 vs 665
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 529 vs 415
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3309
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3309
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 June 2013 vs 4 August 2009 |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 94.1 billion / sec vs 20.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1152 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2,378 gflops vs 832.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 3384 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4794 vs 665 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 529 vs 415 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3309 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro M7740
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 170 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
GPU 2: ATI FirePro M7740
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | ATI FirePro M7740 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4794 | 665 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 529 | 415 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14286 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.505 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 864.402 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.09 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.457 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.186 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6927 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6927 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3309 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1661 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | ATI FirePro M7740 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
Code name | GK104 | M97 |
Launch date | 25 June 2013 | 4 August 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
Place in performance rating | 599 | 601 |
Price now | $249.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 23.69 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 650 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1152 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,378 gflops | 832.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 1152 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 94.1 billion / sec | 20.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 60 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 826 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
Minimum recommended system power | 500 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | 54.1 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 3384 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
PhysX | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |