AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • Around 15% higher core clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 980 MHz
  • Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1201 MHz vs 1033 MHz
  • Around 3% better floating-point performance: 2,460 gflops vs 2,378 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 3.4x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 170 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 656 vs 527
  • Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17711 vs 14219
  • Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 55.077 vs 37.505
  • Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.132 vs 3.09
  • 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 82.584 vs 40.457
  • 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 225.985 vs 84.186
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 10 November 2016 vs 25 June 2013
Core clock speed 1125 MHz vs 980 MHz
Boost clock speed 1201 MHz vs 1033 MHz
Floating-point performance 2,460 gflops vs 2,378 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt vs 170 Watt
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 656 vs 527
Geekbench - OpenCL 17711 vs 14219
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 55.077 vs 37.505
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 4.132 vs 3.09
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 82.584 vs 40.457
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 225.985 vs 84.186

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760

  • Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 94.1 billion / sec vs 76.86 GTexel / s
  • Around 13% higher pipelines: 1152 vs 1024
  • Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4792 vs 3718
  • Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 864.402 vs 830.773
  • Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6927 vs 5431
  • 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 1123
  • Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 2678
  • Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6927 vs 5431
  • 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 1123
  • Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 2678
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 94.1 billion / sec vs 76.86 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1152 vs 1024
Memory clock speed 6008 MHz vs 6000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 4792 vs 3718
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 864.402 vs 830.773
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6927 vs 5431
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3718 vs 1123
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 vs 2678
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6927 vs 5431
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3718 vs 1123
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 vs 2678

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3718
4792
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
656
527
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
17711
14219
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
55.077
37.505
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
830.773
864.402
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4.132
3.09
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
82.584
40.457
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
225.985
84.186
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5431
6927
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1123
3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2678
3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5431
6927
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1123
3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2678
3357
Name AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
PassMark - G3D Mark 3718 4792
PassMark - G2D Mark 656 527
Geekbench - OpenCL 17711 14219
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 55.077 37.505
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 830.773 864.402
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 4.132 3.09
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 82.584 40.457
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 225.985 84.186
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 5431 6927
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1123 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2678 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 5431 6927
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1123 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2678 3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1664

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 Kepler
Code name Baffin GK104
Launch date 10 November 2016 25 June 2013
Launch price (MSRP) $399 $249
Place in performance rating 589 590
Price now $259.99 $249.99
Type Workstation Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 19.63 23.69

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1201 MHz 1033 MHz
Core clock speed 1125 MHz 980 MHz
Floating-point performance 2,460 gflops 2,378 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 1024 1152
Texture fill rate 76.86 GTexel / s 94.1 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 170 Watt
Transistor count 3,000 million 3,540 million
CUDA cores 1152
Maximum GPU temperature 97 °C

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 4x mini-DisplayPort 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI...
Audio input for HDMI Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None Two 6-pin
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length 9.5" (24.1 cm)
Minimum recommended system power 500 Watt

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 96 GB / s 192.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 6000 MHz 6008 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
PhysX
SLI
TXAA