AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 980 MHz
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1201 MHz vs 1033 MHz
- Around 3% better floating-point performance: 2,460 gflops vs 2,378 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.4x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 170 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 656 vs 527
- Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17711 vs 14219
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 55.077 vs 37.505
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.132 vs 3.09
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 82.584 vs 40.457
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 225.985 vs 84.186
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 November 2016 vs 25 June 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1125 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1201 MHz vs 1033 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,460 gflops vs 2,378 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 656 vs 527 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17711 vs 14219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.077 vs 37.505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.132 vs 3.09 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.584 vs 40.457 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 225.985 vs 84.186 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
- Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 94.1 billion / sec vs 76.86 GTexel / s
- Around 13% higher pipelines: 1152 vs 1024
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4792 vs 3718
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 864.402 vs 830.773
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6927 vs 5431
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 1123
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 2678
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6927 vs 5431
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 1123
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 2678
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 94.1 billion / sec vs 76.86 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1152 vs 1024 |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 6000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4792 vs 3718 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 864.402 vs 830.773 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6927 vs 5431 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 1123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 2678 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6927 vs 5431 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 1123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 2678 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3718 | 4792 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 656 | 527 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17711 | 14219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.077 | 37.505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 830.773 | 864.402 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.132 | 3.09 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.584 | 40.457 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 225.985 | 84.186 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5431 | 6927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1123 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2678 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5431 | 6927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1123 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2678 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1664 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Baffin | GK104 |
Launch date | 10 November 2016 | 25 June 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $249 |
Place in performance rating | 589 | 590 |
Price now | $259.99 | $249.99 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.63 | 23.69 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1201 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1125 MHz | 980 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,460 gflops | 2,378 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1152 |
Texture fill rate | 76.86 GTexel / s | 94.1 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 170 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,540 million |
CUDA cores | 1152 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 6-pin |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
Minimum recommended system power | 500 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 192.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
PhysX | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |