AMD Radeon R9 M290X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M290X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M290X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1152
- Around 70% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 170 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 68% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 24008 vs 14261
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 51.022 vs 37.505
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 936.497 vs 864.402
- Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.62 vs 3.09
- Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 77.584 vs 40.457
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 267.307 vs 84.186
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 9 January 2014 vs 25 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 1280 vs 1152 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 170 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 24008 vs 14261 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 51.022 vs 37.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 936.497 vs 864.402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.62 vs 3.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 77.584 vs 40.457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 267.307 vs 84.186 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 850 MHz
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 94.1 billion / sec vs 72 GTexel / s
- Around 3% better floating-point performance: 2,378 gflops vs 2,304 gflops
- 5x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4803 vs 3282
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 532 vs 426
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6927 vs 6666
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 2581
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 2526
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6927 vs 6666
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 2581
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 2526
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 850 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 94.1 billion / sec vs 72 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 2,378 gflops vs 2,304 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4803 vs 3282 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 vs 426 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6927 vs 6666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 2581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 2526 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6927 vs 6666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 2581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 2526 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M290X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 M290X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3282 | 4803 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 426 | 532 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 24008 | 14261 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 51.022 | 37.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 936.497 | 864.402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.62 | 3.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 77.584 | 40.457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 267.307 | 84.186 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6666 | 6927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2581 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2526 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6666 | 6927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2581 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2526 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1659 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 M290X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Neptune | GK104 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Launch date | 9 January 2014 | 25 June 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 573 | 576 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
| Price now | $249.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 23.69 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Compute units | 20 | |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,304 gflops | 2,378 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 1152 |
| Texture fill rate | 72 GTexel / s | 94.1 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 3,540 million |
| CUDA cores | 1152 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Eyefinity | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 6-pin |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| Minimum recommended system power | 500 Watt | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 192.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| PhysX | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 M290X with others
AMDRadeon R9 M290X vs
ATIRadeon X700 PRO
AMDRadeon R9 M290X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760
AMDRadeon R9 M290X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
AMDRadeon R9 M290X vs
NVIDIATesla K40m
AMDRadeon R9 M290X vs
AMDRadeon R7 260
AMDRadeon R9 M290X vs
NVIDIAQuadro M2000
