NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 78% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 4.3x more texture fill rate: 94.1 billion / sec vs 22 GTexel / s
- Around 44% higher pipelines: 1152 vs 800
- 2.7x better floating-point performance: 2,378 gflops vs 880.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.4x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1776 MHz
- 6.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4793 vs 720
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 527 vs 416
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 June 2013 vs 9 January 2009 |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 94.1 billion / sec vs 22 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1152 vs 800 |
Floating-point performance | 2,378 gflops vs 880.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1776 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4793 vs 720 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 527 vs 416 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3350 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4793 | 720 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 527 | 416 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14258 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.505 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 864.402 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.09 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.457 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.186 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6927 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6927 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1663 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
Code name | GK104 | M98 |
Launch date | 25 June 2013 | 9 January 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
Place in performance rating | 589 | 584 |
Price now | $249.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 23.69 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 550 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1152 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,378 gflops | 880.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 1152 | 800 |
Texture fill rate | 94.1 billion / sec | 22 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 956 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
Minimum recommended system power | 500 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | 56.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 1776 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
PhysX | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI | ||
1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports have to be supported by the laptop manufacturer) | ||
DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600 | ||
HDMI support up to 1920x1080 (both with 7.1 AC3 Audio) | ||
PCI-E 2.0 x16 | ||
Powerplay |