NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 628 MHz vs 598 MHz
- Around 26% higher texture fill rate: 42.05 GTexel / s vs 33.5 billion / sec
- 2.3x more pipelines: 768 vs 336
- Around 26% better floating-point performance: 1,009 gflops vs 803.7 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 34% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1526 MB
- 2.7x more memory clock speed: 4008 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 384 vs 307
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 17 March 2014 vs 22 March 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 628 MHz vs 598 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 GTexel / s vs 33.5 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 336 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops vs 803.7 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1526 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 384 vs 307 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1745 vs 1226
- 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3627 vs 953
- 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3627 vs 953
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 1552
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 1552
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1745 vs 1226 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3627 vs 953 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3627 vs 953 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 1552 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 1552 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1226 | 1745 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 384 | 307 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 953 | 3627 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 953 | 3627 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1552 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1552 | 3346 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6497 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.053 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 588.645 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.72 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.916 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 52.899 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2731 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2731 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2062 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | GK106 | GF114 |
| Launch date | 17 March 2014 | 22 March 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 927 | 928 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 657 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 598 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 803.7 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 336 |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 GTexel / s | 33.5 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,950 million |
| CUDA cores | 336 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1526 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB / s | 72.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760A vs
NVIDIAGeForce PCX 5300
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760A vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 675M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760A vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760A vs
AMDRadeon R5 M330
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760A vs
AMDRadeon 540X Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760A vs
IntelArc A350M
