NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 1% higher core clock speed: 628 MHz vs 620 MHz
Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 42.05 GTexel / s vs 39.7 billion / sec
2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
Around 6% better floating-point performance: 1,009 gflops vs 952.3 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
Around 82% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 100 Watt
2.7x more memory clock speed: 4008 MHz vs 1500 MHz
Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 384 vs 312

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	17 March 2014 vs 22 March 2012
Core clock speed	628 MHz vs 620 MHz
Texture fill rate	42.05 GTexel / s vs 39.7 billion / sec
Pipelines	768 vs 384
Floating-point performance	1,009 gflops vs 952.3 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt vs 100 Watt
Memory clock speed	4008 MHz vs 1500 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	384 vs 312

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M

Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1925 vs 1226
3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 vs 953
3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 vs 953
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3347 vs 1552
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3347 vs 1552

Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1925 vs 1226
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3690 vs 953
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3690 vs 953
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3347 vs 1552
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3347 vs 1552

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1226

1925

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

384

312

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

953

3690

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

953

3690

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1552

3347

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1552

3347

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M
PassMark - G3D Mark	1226	1925
PassMark - G2D Mark	384	312
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	953	3690
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	953	3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1552	3347
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1552	3347
Geekbench - OpenCL		6362
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		22.12
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		664.78
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		2.003
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		33.983
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		59.007
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		2649
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		2649

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi 2.0
Code name	GK106	GF114
Launch date	17 March 2014	22 March 2012
Place in performance rating	927	929
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	657 MHz
Core clock speed	628 MHz	620 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,009 gflops	952.3 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	768	384
Texture fill rate	42.05 GTexel / s	39.7 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt	100 Watt
Transistor count	2,540 million	1,950 million
CUDA cores		384
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Bus support		PCI Express 2.0
Laptop size		large
SLI options		2-way
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12 API
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL		1.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	64.13 GB / s	96.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256bit
Memory clock speed	4008 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
DirectX 11		DirectX 11
FXAA
SLI